Sunday, 23 August 2015

950 Charles Bradlaugh


Constituency  : Northampton  1880-91

There's  no  doubt  who  the  most  controversial  of  the  new  intake  of  Liberal  MPs  was. Charles  was  one  of  the  two  Liberal  victors  at  Northampton  alongside  the  ostentatious  Radical  Henry Labouchere.

Charles  was  a  legal  clerk's  son  from  London. He  started  in  clerical  jobs. After  a  spell  as  a  Sunday  school  teacher  he  began  having  religious  doubts  and  was  expelled  from  both  hi  post  and  the  family  home. He  was  taken  in  by  the  widow  of  atheist  agitator  Richard  Carlile  who  introduced  him  to  the  secularist  George  Holyoake. Her  encouraged  Charles  to  start  giving  atheist  lectures.  In  the  1850s  he  served  briefly  in  the  army  in  Dublin  but  soon  bought  himself  out. He  then  became  a  solicitor's  clerk  who  published  pamphlets  in  his  spare  time  , anonymously  first  to  protect  his  employer's  reputation. He  became  editor  of  the  secularist  paper  the  National  Reformer   which  fought  off  a  government  prosecution  for  blasphemy  and  sedition  in  1868. In  1866  he  founded  the  National  Secular  Society. He  was  a  member  of  the  Reform  League  but  attacked  its  leadership. In  1876  he  and  his  cohort  Annie  Besant  were  again  prosecuted  for  re-publishing  an  American  pamphlet  advocating  birth  control. They  got  six months  and  a  heavy  fine  but  got  off  on  Appeal  on  a  technicality. The  trial  led  to  the  start  of  the  Malthusian  League. Charles  was  also  a  republican  who  resigned  from  his  masonic  lodge  when  Prince  Edward  became  its  Grand  Master. The  young  Philip  Snowden  saw  him  speak  and  recalled  "He  was  a  massive  figure, with  a  fine  head  and  powerful  voice  and  in  declamation  he  was  a  tremendous  force".

When  Charles  became  an  MP  he  had  a  problem  with  swearing  the  Parliamentary  oath  of  allegiance  because  of  its  religious  character  and  asked  to  be  allowed to  affirm  instead  as  was  allowed  in  the  courts. The  Speaker  Henry  Brand  was  opposed  to  the  idea  and  asked  the  House  for  its  judgement. Gladstone's  government  referred  the  matter  to  a  Select  Committee. The  Attorney  General  Sir  Henry  James  thought  the  affirmation  was  OK  but  the  Select  Committee  rejected  his  advice  on  the  casting  vote  of  the  chairman  when  the  Liberal  Charles  Hopwood  sided  with  the  Conservatives.

Charles  then  said  he  would  take  the  Oath  but  wrote  a  letter  to  The  Times  explaining  that it  was  involuntary  and  he  would  "regard  myself  as  bound, not  by  the  spirit  of  its  words, but  by  the  spirit  which  affirmation  would  have  conveyed  had  I  been  allowed  to  take  it".  A  Tory  MP  objected  to  Charles  taking  the  Oath  an  Brand  took  his  side. Gladstone  now  proposed  a  second  Select  Committee  to  decide on  whether  such  an  objection  was  permissible  and  the  House  agreed.

The  Select  Committee  rejected  the  idea  of  allowing  Charles  to  take  the  oath  but  said  he  should  be  allowed  to  affirm  in  the  hope  that  it  would  provoke  a  legal  challenge  and  thus  pass  the  decision  to  the  courts. Labouchere  moved  to  effect  this  in  the  Commons  but  was  defeated  by  a  Tory  amendment  closing  off  either  option. Charles  turned  up  the  next  day  to  take  the  oath. Brand  ordered  him  to  withdraw  but  permitted  him  to  argue  his  case  from  "behind  the  Bar". When,  after  this,  Charles  refused  to  leave  the  House  he  was  taken  into  custody  by  the  Serjeant-at-Arms  and  placed  in  the  Tower  of  London.  In  his  last  effective  act  as  Tory  leader,  Disraeli  persuaded  his  party  it  was  advisable  to  release  him.

This  meant  a  by-election  which  Charles  easily  won  and  the  whole  fiasco  was  re-run  each  year  with  Charles  being  re-elected  four  times. The  matter  was  a  severe  disruption  to  government  business , a  factor  that  probably  informed  much  of  the  Tory  opposition. Gladstone  supported  his  right  to  affirm  but  found  it  difficult  to  persuade  enough  of  his  party  to  let  a  bill  through  on  the  matter. A  huge  petition  gathered  by  Charles  in  1882  failed  to  break  the  deadlock.

Charles  was  finally  allowed to  take  the  oath by  the  new  Speaker  Arthur  Peel   in  1886  and  two years  later  helped  secure  a  new  Oaths  Act  which  allowed  MPs  to  affirm  and  clarified  the  use  of  affirmations  in  the  courts. In  1886  he  moved  to  reduce  the  supply  estimates  relating  to  missions  and  embassies. He  supported  Home  Rule  and  opposed  Salisbury's  imperialist  policies.

Aside  from  his  views  on  religion  and  monarchy   Charles  was  quite  a  right  wing  Liberal  committed  to  classical  political  economy . He  opposed  social  reform  which  discouraged  self-reliance  and  backed  away  from  social  republicanism  after  the  Paris  Commune.  He  and  Besant  drifted  apart  over  her  support  for  socialism  which  he  vigorously  opposed.

He  died  in  1891  aged  57.      

No comments:

Post a Comment